The Record

The people who understand AI best won't let it leave the building.

None of these companies rejected artificial intelligence. They rejected sending their confidential data to someone else's cloud — and most built their own private tools instead. That distinction is the entire point.

Samsung2023
Banned employees from ChatGPT and other generative AI after engineers pasted proprietary chip source code and internal meeting notes into it. The stated worry: data sent to the chatbot lives on outside servers, with no way to pull it back.
Apple2023
Restricted employees from ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot over fear of leaking software-development secrets — and told staff to use an internal tool instead.
JPMorgan Chase2023
Restricted global staff from ChatGPT — not over a single incident, but as a matter of policy, to keep confidential data inside the bank's own walls.
Wall Street2023
Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Wells Fargo and Verizon all barred employee use of ChatGPT over data-leak and compliance risk — the industry that handles the most sensitive information, treading the most carefully.
Goldman Sachs — the reversal2026
The firm whose CIO publicly championed AI "vibe coding" in July reversed course by autumn — restricting bankers and traders from advanced third-party AI tools and limiting them to engineers, after a productivity-and-risk review. The champions are pulling back the reins.
Every one of them is racing to use AI.
What they won't do is let it leave the building.
That's not a verdict against intelligence. It's a verdict against egress — the exact problem Aura was built to end. On-device. Nothing leaves the room.
Just between you and her.